Loading…
Academic Journal
Criteria A and B of the alternative model for personality disorders as prospective predictors of psychosocial functioning in community-based adolescents: A 1-year follow-up study.
Barkauskienė R, Gaudiešiūtė E, Grigaitė A, Skabeikytė-Norkienė G
Personality disorders [Personal Disord] 2025 May; Vol. 16 (3), pp. 286-296. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Feb 13.
2025
Saved in:
Title | Criteria A and B of the alternative model for personality disorders as prospective predictors of psychosocial functioning in community-based adolescents: A 1-year follow-up study. |
---|---|
Authors | Barkauskienė R, Gaudiešiūtė E, Grigaitė A, Skabeikytė-Norkienė G |
Source |
Personality disorders [Personal Disord] 2025 May; Vol. 16 (3), pp. 286-296. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Feb 13.
|
Abstract |
Research on the dimensional approach to personality disorders in relation to psychosocial functioning is limited, particularly among adolescents. Since adolescence is a critical developmental period from the emergence of personality disorders, it is crucial to understand how both Criterion A (the level of personality functioning) and Criterion B (maladaptive personality traits) contribute to various domains of psychosocial functioning in this age group. To address this research gap, the current study evaluated the extent to which Criterion A and Criterion B of the alternative model for personality disorders predict psychosocial functioning in community-based sample adolescents over a 1-year period, beyond the overall psychopathology and baseline levels of psychosocial functioning. The study involved 855 adolescents aged 11-18 ( M = 14.44, SD = 1.60; 62.5% female) at baseline and followed up 1 year later, achieving a 94% retention rate. Measurements included the assessments of the level of personality functioning, maladaptive personality traits, overall psychopathology, academic functioning, social functioning, and well-being. The findings indicated that while both Criterion A and Criterion B are associated with lower levels of psychosocial functioning 1 year later, their contributions varied across domains. Criterion A significantly predicted functioning in social and well-being domains, while Criterion B predicted social difficulties only. Neither Criterion A nor Criterion B was significant in predicting academic functioning. Psychoticism contributed to the experience of social rebuff, while detachment was uniquely linked to a lower quality of life. The results contribute to the understanding of how dimensionally defined personality pathology affects psychosocial functioning, adding a prospective perspective during adolescence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
|
Language |
English
|
Journal Info |
Publisher: Educational Pub. Foundation of the American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101517071 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1949-2723 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19492723 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Personal Disord Subsets: MEDLINE
|
MeSH Terms | |
Update Code |
20250505
|
This result is restricted to LU affiliated users only.
Sign in or register for an institutional account to gain full access, if eligible. |