One of the challenges in diagnosing psychiatric disorders is that the results of biological and neuroscience research are not reflected in t
One of the challenges in diagnosing psychiatric disorders is that the results of biological and neuroscience research are not reflected in the diagnostic criteria. Thus, data‐driven analyses incorporating biological and cross‐disease perspectives, regardless of the diagnostic category, have recently been proposed. A data‐driven clustering study based on subcortical volumes in 5604 subjects classified into four brain biotypes associated with cognitive/social functioning. Among the four brain biotypes identified in controls and patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and other psychiatric disorders, we further analyzed the brain biotype 1 subjects, those with an extremely small limbic region, for clinical utility. We found that the representative feature of brain biotype 1 is enlarged lateral ventricles. An enlarged ventricle, defined by an average z‐score of left and right lateral ventricle volumes > 3, had a sensitivity of 99.1% and a specificity of 98.1% for discriminating brain biotype 1. However, the presence of an enlarged ventricle was not sufficient to classify patient subgroups, as 1% of the controls also had enlarged ventricles. Reclassification of patients with enlarged ventricles according to cognitive impairment resulted in a stratified subgroup that included patients with a high proportion of schizophrenia diagnoses, electroencephalography abnormalities, and rare pathological genetic copy number variations. Data‐driven clustering analysis of neuroimaging data revealed subgroups with enlarged ventricles and cognitive impairment. This subgroup could be a new diagnostic candidate for psychiatric disorders. This concept and strategy may be useful for identifying biologically defined psychiatric disorders in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Neuropsychopharmacology Reports is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sit
Copyright of Neuropsychopharmacology Reports is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
